Debate on Genetically Modified Food Essay Example for Free

Debate on Genetically Modified Food EssayFor millions of years, the world has evolved and developed, by selective breeding to adapt into the society, which it is today. Natural adaptations and changes collect occurred in various species of plants and animals, which even modern scientists cannot explain. Our world has survived for well forever, without ancestralally enhanced produce, so why should it invade humanity now, just because we can? Many scientists, who argon in favour of GM foods, claim that it is simply the next step on from selective breeding however they seem to have overlooked atomic number 53 difference. Genetic modification of anything requires the introduction of alien genes into a species, to modify it and this is certainly not a natural process. For example, GM Soya has been modified using genes that ordain make it resistant to certain herbicides, such(prenominal) as roundup. Although this may seem like a good thing on the surface, what happens when the poll en from these GM foods is passed on to inbred species? Aspects like this seem to have been overlooked. It is also a worry, because genetic engineering can be very unpredict adapted and the damaging emergences of GM foods permanent if left unconfined it could get out of control.It is possible to end up creating harmful characteristics such as toxins unawares. This doesnt necessarily condemn GMOs but it proves the unpredictability of genetic manipulation. The establishment for GM foods is keen to cover up any findings, which may turn people against GM foods, (possibly due to the huge profits involved). One cross scientist, in a report from the Rowett Research Institute, had been independently researching the effects of GM potatoes on rats.What his studies found was that they had a detrimental effect on the immune constitution and the growth of the rats. However when the establishment found this out, this man was reduced from creation a well-respected researcher to a mad cap sc ientist. Although it is agreed that genetically modifying ingrain to include beta-carotene (vitamin C) may aid hunger and poor eyesight problems in third world countries, there is a large-scale scandal going on among large biotech companies, who want to increase their already large profits.GM food production, gives larger firms a loop hole in which they are able to disgust the power of modifying these crops to their own specification. Recently, there have been reports that these companies have developed doomsday seeds, which they want to sell onto the world market particularly the struggling third world. These seeds have been genetically modified, so that once they have grown, the seeds they produce will genetically destroy themselves.These seeds may be an excellent money-spinner for the firms who sell them, but certainly it is morally and ethically wrong to sell such seeds to poor and starving countries? The companies also have the added leverage over other seed producers becaus e they are able to genetically modify their plants to grow faster and thus their seeds are cheaper than others. These people in the third world will eventually be forced into a downward spiral of having to buy new crops every year, because they are unable to afford the more expensive normal seeds.And what would happen if these genes happened to escape into the environment? GM genes may spread into wild populations with unpredictable and potentially harmful consequences In this case, they may even cause crops to produce sterile seeds, which could have an adverse effect on the ecosystem. If we are to have confidence in GM foods, then larger businesses should be kept out of research. The way GM foods are being exploited by powerful corporations is a threat to democracy.These crops are unsustainable in light of longer-term plans and the great majority of the GM market is focussed more on profit rather than improving our diet. Insufficient testing has taken place to ensure their safety f or public consumption. Research should be carried out independently, to assess whether such foods would be a benefit to our society and the effects it will have on the eco-system. Only then should they be allowed onto the market.